Prologue
|
|
View from Sierra Vista Winery
|
Wall Street Journal: "Many Australian Chardonnays
under $20 have more character than many similarly
priced American Chardonnays."
The Rest of the Story
In
view of the Journal's opinion, we decided to compare
a broader spectrum of Australian wines with similarly priced
California wines, all carefully sacked to conceal their
identity. There were eight pair, and here are the winners.
The wine winning by the largest margin is listed last.
Winning Margin
(% over loser's score) |
Winner |
Price |
Year |
The Wine |
| 8th |
- |
17% |
Australia |
$11 |
'98 |
Cabernet Sauvignon by Rosemount |
| 7th |
- |
19% |
California |
$9 |
'98 |
Chardonnay (Sundial) by Fetzer |
| 6th |
- |
29% |
Australia |
$19 |
'96 |
Traditional (Cab, etc.) by Rosemount |
| 5th |
- |
45% |
Australia |
$15 |
'96 |
Shiraz (Syrah) by Jacob's Creek |
| 4th |
- |
48% |
Australia |
$23 |
'96 |
Shiraz Show Reserve by Rosemount |
| 3rd |
- |
61% |
California |
$13 |
'96 |
Chardonnay by Sebastiani |
| 2nd |
- |
82% |
California |
$9 |
'96 |
Syrah by Monterra Promise |
| Winner |
- |
93% |
California |
$18 |
'97 |
Syrah by Sierra Vista
(pictured) |
Comment
Four winners apiece. So these data agree with
the Journal that Australian wines of the same varietal
and price are certainly competitive with those
of California. Golden State boosters will
probably claim an edge, since their four won by
an average of 64% while the Aussie winning
margin averaged only about half as much at
35%. My own policy...buy whichever one is on
special.
|