Prologue
"A
facet of Merlot's increasing popularity is its tendency
to make softer and less tannic wines than does Cabernet
Sauvignon. [It is ready sooner], requiring less long-term
cellaring than Cabernet."
...Charles L. Sullivan, Companion to California Wine
The Rest of the Story
So, does a young Merlot taste better than a young
Cabernet Sauvignon? To get an answer, we
tasted blind ten 1997 Cabs, each paired with a
Merlot of the same year and the same price. When
the voting was completed and the bottles unwrapped,
here's what we found. The wines that won by the
largest margin are listed last.
| Place |
Winning
Margin
|
Winning
Varietal |
Price |
The Wine |
| 10th |
0.6% |
Merlot |
$21 |
Sattui, Napa Valley |
| 9th |
5.4% |
Merlot |
$12 |
Rosenblum, Napa Valley |
| 8th |
9.8% |
Merlot |
$15 |
Jekel, Monterey |
| 7th |
18.3% |
Merlot |
$15 |
Shooting Star, Lake County |
| 6th |
22.3% |
Cab |
$11 |
Napa Ridge, Central Coast |
| 5th |
26.8% |
Merlot |
$14 |
Echelon (Chalone), Central
Coast |
| 4th |
29.4% |
Merlot |
$10 |
C. Mitchell, El Dorado |
| 3rd |
32.5% |
Cab |
$13 |
Firestone, Santa Ynez Valley |
| 2nd |
33.1% |
Cab |
$7 |
Stone Creek, California |
| Winner |
34.0% |
Merlot |
$18 |
Baywood Cellars, Monterey |
Conclusion
The 1997 Merlots won seven out of ten matches. This test
helps explain Merlot's explosive sales record. Young Merlots
usually DO taste better.
|